There aren’t many engines that stay in production for 70 years. Even the venerable small block Chevy V8 only lasted 48 years before it was discontinued in America – although it is still made in Mexico 62 years after its introduction. But the basic Chevy overhead valve inline six-cylinder engine was first introduced in 1929 and remained in active production until 2001, for a total production run of 72 years. The Chevrolet straight six was introduced for the 1929 model year as the brand’s only power plant, replacing the 2.8-liter four-cylinder engine that powered earlier Chevs. This pushrod six-cylinder design was only engine offered by Chevrolet from 1929 until the advent of the small block V8 in 1955. First a Stovebolt Six The earliest of these engines were known as “stovebolt” sixes, because the bolts that held the engine together resembled the bolts that were commonly used to assemble woodstoves. The new 1929 engine displaced 3.2-liters (194 cubic inches) and made 50 horsepower. While lubrication for the connecting rod bearings was by the traditional “splash” method of dragging the crank through the oil in the pan, the engine offered pressurized lubrication for the three main bearings, and a pushrod-actuated overhead valve design. Compression was low, at 5:1, and the cast-iron pistons were of course quite heavy. The original stovebolt engine was produced until 1936, with a 1932 update to 60 horsepower, and a revised version introduced for 1934 that raised the horsepower to 80 from a 3.4-liter (207 cubic inch) displacement. The Blue Flame Era In 1937, the six-cylinder engine that came to be known as the “Blue Flame” was adopted. This plant was even bigger, at 3.5 liters (216.5 cubic inches) and 6.5:1 compression, yielding 85 horsepower. An additional pressurized main bearing was added, making the engine more reliable with four mains, and oil squirters to lubricate the connecting rod bearings. Compression increases in 1941 pushed output to 90 horsepower, and then to 92 horsepower in 1949. The 1941 heavy truck modification to this engine series boosted displacement to 3.9-liters (235 cubic inches) and power to 123 horsepower in the Thrift-King equipped with solid lifters. The same engine achieved 136 horsepower with hydraulic lifters. The final modifications to the Blue Flame generation came in 1954, with the fully pressurized Thriftmaster and the larger Jobmaster truck engine. The Thriftmaster made 140 horsepower, and is among the most highly regarded of the straight-six engines for its durability. The Jobmaster variant displaced 4.3 liters or 261 cubic inches, and developed 148 horsepower. A Modern Engine The final generation based on the 1929 design was first installed in 1962. This was almost a complete redesign, with 7 main bearings, all bearing surfaces pressurized, and it was designed to share parts with the small block V8 engine. The result, however, was durable and economical and continued to be used in new American passenger cars until 1979 and in trucks through 1988. This is the engine that was produced and used until 2001 in Brazil. This final generation was produced in 2.9-liter (194 cubic inch) and 3.8-liter (230 cubic inch) variants. A single overhead cam variant was developed for Pontiac vehicles, and that engine made up to 215 horsepower. In 1975, displacement was bumped again to 4.1-liters (250 cubic inches) and 155 horsepower. The Blue Flame Six and the Corvette When the first Corvette was brought out in 1953, it carried a special version of the Blue Flame engine. The Corvette power plant was a 235 cubic inch engine with the 261 truck camshaft, which offered higher lift than normal 235 engines received. Induction was by three single-throat sidedraft Carter carburetors. The result was still a pretty tame 150 horsepower, delivered to the rear wheels through a two-speed automatic transmission. The Corvette was offered only with the Blue Flame Six in 1953 and 1954. In 1955 the small block V8 and the Blue Flame were offered, but the small block could be ordered with a 3-speed manual transmission. Then Zora Arkus-Duntov got ahold of the Corvette, and that’s a whole story on its own. Chevrolet’s Most Significant Engine? The long-standing Chevrolet straight-6 engine was eventually phased out in favor of the Vortec V6, but millions upon millions of GM vehicles around the world were powered by this design for decades. No one knows for sure, but probably millions of these engines remain in service today. From Australia to South Africa and South America, the Chevrolet straight-six engine has been prized for its longevity and willingness to work. The Small Block V8 gets a lot of well-deserved glory, and for versatility and power modifications that engine has no equal. But if you look at sales figures through the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, you’ll see that for every car ordered with a V8, Chevrolet sold three, five, even ten vehicles powered by the straight six. If the V8 is a race horse, the ancient Stovebolt Six was Chevrolet’s workhorse of the 20th century.
Article courtesy of Chevy Hardcore, written by There aren’t many engines that stay in production for 70 years. Even the venerable small block Chevy V8 only lasted 48 years before it was discontinued in America – although it is still made in Mexico 62 years after its introduction. But the basic Chevy overhead valve inline six-cylinder engine was first introduced in 1929 and remained in active production until 2001, for a total production run of 72 years. The Chevrolet straight six was introduced for the 1929 model year as the brand’s only power plant, replacing the 2.8-liter four-cylinder engine that powered earlier Chevs. This pushrod six-cylinder design was only engine offered by Chevrolet from 1929 until the advent of the small block V8 in 1955. First a Stovebolt Six The earliest of these engines were known as “stovebolt” sixes, because the bolts that held the engine together resembled the bolts that were commonly used to assemble woodstoves. The new 1929 engine displaced 3.2-liters (194 cubic inches) and made 50 horsepower. While lubrication for the connecting rod bearings was by the traditional “splash” method of dragging the crank through the oil in the pan, the engine offered pressurized lubrication for the three main bearings, and a pushrod-actuated overhead valve design. Compression was low, at 5:1, and the cast-iron pistons were of course quite heavy. The original stovebolt engine was produced until 1936, with a 1932 update to 60 horsepower, and a revised version introduced for 1934 that raised the horsepower to 80 from a 3.4-liter (207 cubic inch) displacement. The Blue Flame Era In 1937, the six-cylinder engine that came to be known as the “Blue Flame” was adopted. This plant was even bigger, at 3.5 liters (216.5 cubic inches) and 6.5:1 compression, yielding 85 horsepower. An additional pressurized main bearing was added, making the engine more reliable with four mains, and oil squirters to lubricate the connecting rod bearings. Compression increases in 1941 pushed output to 90 horsepower, and then to 92 horsepower in 1949. The 1941 heavy truck modification to this engine series boosted displacement to 3.9-liters (235 cubic inches) and power to 123 horsepower in the Thrift-King equipped with solid lifters. The same engine achieved 136 horsepower with hydraulic lifters. The final modifications to the Blue Flame generation came in 1954, with the fully pressurized Thriftmaster and the larger Jobmaster truck engine. The Thriftmaster made 140 horsepower, and is among the most highly regarded of the straight-six engines for its durability. The Jobmaster variant displaced 4.3 liters or 261 cubic inches, and developed 148 horsepower. A Modern Engine The final generation based on the 1929 design was first installed in 1962. This was almost a complete redesign, with 7 main bearings, all bearing surfaces pressurized, and it was designed to share parts with the small block V8 engine. The result, however, was durable and economical and continued to be used in new American passenger cars until 1979 and in trucks through 1988. This is the engine that was produced and used until 2001 in Brazil. This final generation was produced in 2.9-liter (194 cubic inch) and 3.8-liter (230 cubic inch) variants. A single overhead cam variant was developed for Pontiac vehicles, and that engine made up to 215 horsepower. In 1975, displacement was bumped again to 4.1-liters (250 cubic inches) and 155 horsepower. The Blue Flame Six and the Corvette 1955 Chevrolet Corvette – Sugarloaf Mountain Region AACA Show When the first Corvette was brought out in 1953, it carried a special version of the Blue Flame engine. The Corvette power plant was a 235 cubic inch engine with the 261 truck camshaft, which offered higher lift than normal 235 engines received. Induction was by three single-throat sidedraft Carter carburetors. The result was still a pretty tame 150 horsepower, delivered to the rear wheels through a two-speed automatic transmission. 1955 Chevrolet Corvette – Sugarloaf Mountain Region AACA Show The Corvette was offered only with the Blue Flame Six in 1953 and 1954. In 1955 the small block V8 and the Blue Flame were offered, but the small block could be ordered with a 3-speed manual transmission. Then Zora Arkus-Duntov got ahold of the Corvette, and that’s a whole story on its own. Chevrolet’s Most Significant Engine? The long-standing Chevrolet straight-6 engine was eventually phased out in favor of the Vortec V6, but millions upon millions of GM vehicles around the world were powered by this design for decades. No one knows for sure, but probably millions of these engines remain in service today. From Australia to South Africa and South America, the Chevrolet straight-six engine has been prized for its longevity and willingness to work. The Small Block V8 gets a lot of well-deserved glory, and for versatility and power modifications that engine has no equal. But if you look at sales figures through the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, you’ll see that for every car ordered with a V8, Chevrolet sold three, five, even ten vehicles powered by the straight six. If the V8 is a race horse, the ancient Stovebolt Six was Chevrolet’s workhorse of the 20th century. Article courtesy of Chevy Hardcore, written by Jeff Zurschmeide.
0 Comments
There’s no denying that a ’49 Mercury was, and still is, the epitome of “cool.” Didn’t that Hollywood icon, James Dean, make that fact known to all in the movie “Rebel Without A Cause”? Didn’t those two Barris brothers from Lynwood, California, start a craze that continues today – chopping the top of a ’49 Mercury coupe? Didn’t Dick Dean,the Sultan of Chop, build several and make them famous? Isn’t the Hirohata Merc one of the most famous Mercury’s in the world? Ok, don’t send us hate mail, we know the Hirohata Mercury is a ’51 model, but there’s no denying that the ’49 through ‘51 Mercury is one of the most recognizable cars in the world. It ranks right up there, along with a 1932 Ford and a 1957 Chevy. History For our history lesson on this icon, in 1949 there were four basic body styles produced: a four-door sedan, a two-door sedan (and often referred to as a sport coupe), the convertible and a wood and metal bodied station wagon. To make all of us yearn for the good old days, prices began at $1,979 for the two-door sedan, and rose to $2,716 for the wagon. Don’t you wish you could find one for that price today? If you did, what you’d likely get would be what was left after it had been at the bottom of a lake for 50 or so years. Which would probably be not much. A total of 301,302 Mercury’s were produced for the 1949 model year. Of that, only 8,044 (according to the Classic Car Database) were station wagons. That fact alone makes them quite rare. However, the wagon featured here was not one of those 8,044 produced by Mercury, believe it or not, this one actually rolled of the assembly line as a sport coupe, and we’ll have more on that in a minute. Dave Dolman of Verdon, Nebraska, owns, drives and built the wagon featured here. In 1996, Dave started on the Mercury after accumulating enough parts. Suffice to say, what was left of the Mercury was in very sad shape. The car had been hit in the side and a tree had caved in the roof. Dave had taken it in on trade for some other work he’d performed. It was in such bad shape that friends told Dave that he’d never finish the wagon. Several times over the years it seemed that they were correct. Dave eventually made them eat their words. Fortunately, Dave had owned several other Mercury’s before he tackled this one, so he knew the inner workings of the model. This Mercury is not a kit car, it was built the old fashioned way –scouring the junk yards for parts and putting them together by hand in a pleasing way. Dave makes his livelihood rebuilding cars for other people so the years pass quickly in his shop. After starting on the ‘49, Dave was interrupted several times by building and finishing a customer’s ’49 Merc coupe and a ’50 Merc coupe, redoing a ’59 Mercury station wagon and modifying a ’55 Pontiac two door wagon. Ten years later, in 2006, Dave finally found time to work on his own wagon again. In the meantime, he’d scrounged a ’57 Ford station wagon roof and some ’56 Ford station wagon parts including side windows as well as the windowed liftgate and tailgate from the same car. Adding The Sheetmetal First he needed a newer chassis for all the metal he was going to add. The built chassis consists of a ’79 Monte Carlo clip with 2.5-inch dropped spindles, air bags, a 1.25-inch sway bar, and Wilwood disc brakes. Around back, a nine-inch Ford with wagon drum brakes was used. A GM crate engine of 355 cubic-inches and a 700 R-4 automatic transmission was set on the mounts after an Olds faux valve covers and a ’53 Cadillac air cleaner were added. When it came to the sheet metal, the floors were the first to be added, stiffening the body – they came out of a ’56 Ford wagon and were fitted masterfully so the wagon look wouldn’t be lost in the process. The ’57 Ford roof was deskinned and five-inches were removed from the crown, flattening the roof. It was also narrowed six inches to fit on the 3.5-inch chopped windshield frame. Braces were added to support the length of the top and the ’56 Ford wagon side windows were chopped 4.5-inches to match the new angled front pillars. The Merc then needed new quarters in order to match up to the Ford side windows so Dave hand-built the quarters and added ’52 Mercury taillights to them. The liftgate may look stock, but it is certainly not. It was modified by adding metal to the top of it and narrowing the bottom of it. That accomplished, the liftgate fit the tailgate and worked perfectly. Just below that, a new pan was rolled and a pair of ’55 Pontiac split bumpers were fitted, a license plate box was added and the exhaust pipes were relocated to the quarter’s sides behind the rear of the wheelwells. Inside, a tilt column was pirated from a ’74 Chevy van and topped with an Impala steering wheel. The front seat is from a ’65 Buick Electra, the rear seat is out of a ’56 Ford station wagon and both are covered in Kalfskin Beige leather. Dave hand built the rear interior quarter panels out of aluminum and had them covered in a tuck n’ roll pattern using the same Kalfskin leather. Larry Cummings of Countryside Upholstery in Humboldt, Nebraska did the headliner, carpeting and the interior. The stainless “rub strips” on the interior floor are courtesy of the ’56 Ford wagon and add a finished look to the rear of the Mercury. Even though it took Dave better than 12 years (actual build time was 2.5 years) to put his vision on the streets, the car looks as fresh today as it did eight years ago. The good news is that Dave and his wife Shirley are no strangers to road trips. Every time Dave drives his wagon to a show (the latest being to the James Dean Festival in Fairmount, Indiana, in late September, 2016), he’s always asked the same question: “How many steel bodied two-door station wagons did they make?” Dave’s answer: “They didn’t make any, I built the only one!”
One thing is certain. The 1949, 1950 and 1951 Mercurys were hot when they were new, and remain a must have for any serious collection, no matter which model is desired. Article courtesy of Rod Authority, written by Roger Jetter. |
Categories
All
Archives
January 2021
|